|
|
|
|
New
Mexico Genealogical Society |
|
| Home | Programs
| |
NMGS Books |
Membership
| Contact Us | NMGS BLOG
| New
Mexico in the Civil War
by Oliver James Stevens |
| Valverde 21 February, 1862 |
Glorieta 28
March, 1862 |
|
| Civil
War battles occurred in New Mexico that were little noted
in the "States" (New Mexico was then a Territory).
In the view of many historians, however, these battles
were important in preserving the Union because they ended
the attempt by the Confederacy to capture the West (New
Mexico, Arizona, California, Colorado), its people, and
its vast resources. Two of these battles were at Valverde,
about 29 miles south of Socorro, and at Glorieta, a few
miles east of Santa Fe.
The poignant nature of
the Civil War was particularly relevant here: the two
commanding officers of the New Mexico battles, Col. Sibley
of the Confederate Army, and Col. Canby of the Union army,
had campaigned together in earlier battles and there were
even rumors (untrue, as it turns out) that he and Sibley
were brothers-in-law.
Much has been written
about these battles, the leaders, tactics and results,
but too little about the individuals; the foot soldiers
and volunteers who fought the battles and, for many of
us, our ancestors.
F. Stanley, in his book
The Civil War in New Mexico1
provides a list of New Mexico Volunteers who were enrolled
during the four years of the war. The list includes more
than four thousand names of New Mexicans who put aside
their daily lives to volunteer for service in the Union
forces. Stanley derived his list from the service records
of the volunteers, on microfilm in the National Archives.2
Charles Meketa3
provides examples of the service and sacrifice by New
Mexico natives. Of the troops fighting at Valverde, the
one suffering the second highest number of casualties
was Captain Santiago Hubbell's Company B, 5th New Mexico
Infantry Volunteers.4
That company was in the front lines at Valverde, defending
the battery of Captain Alexander McRae. From a company
of 74 men, 39 (53% of the total company) were killed,
wounded, or missing in action.
Those names are spelled
here as Meketa found them written in the records. |
| Jose
Clemente ALARIA, musician, killed
Ramon ALARIA, Pvt., missing
Charles BENSINGER, Pvt., killed
Pablo CANDALARIO, Pvt., killed
Ramon CHAVEZ, Pvt., missing
Ramon CANDALARIO, Pvt., killed
Espamino CHAVEZ, Pvt., missing
Mauricio CHAVES, Pvt., killed
Mauricio CHAVEZ, Pvt., missing
Rubio CRUZ, Pvt., wounded
Marcilina DURAN, Pvt., killed
Juan GARCIA, Pvt., killed
Nasario GARCIA, Pvt., killed
Basilio GONSALES, Pvt., killed
Rumaldo GRIEGO, Pvt., killed
Jose Maria GURRERA, Pvt., missing
Guadalupe LOPES, Pvt., killed
Diego LUCERO, Corp., killed
Jose de la Lus LUCERO, Pvt., killed
Jesus MARCUS, Pvt., wounded
Basillo MARTIN, Pvt., wounded
Juan CHAVEZ MEXICANNA, Pvt., killed
Antonio MONTOYA, Pvt., wounded
Victoriano MONTOYA, Pvt., wounded
Pedro PADILLO, Pvt., killed
Juan PAIS, Pvt., wounded
Jose PERALTO, Corp., missing
Salvador RIAL, Pvt., missing
Ramon RIVAL, Pvt., wounded
Gomesindo RIVERA, Pvt., killed
Benino SANCHES, Pvt., killed
Clemente SANCHES, Pvt., wounded
Jose SANCHES, Pvt., wounded
Ygnacio SANDOVAL, Pvt., missing
Jose de Jesus TAPIO, Pvt., killed
Manual TRUGILLO, Pvt., wounded
Felipe TURRIETE, Pvt., wounded
Pablo ZUNI, Pvt., killed |
| Meketa's
research directs our attention to evidence that slanted
reports were sent to Washington in order to shift blame
for the Union loss at the Battle of Valverde. "Castigated
for their role in the Battle of Valverde were the two
companies of New Mexicans which formed part of the support
for McRae's battery those of Captains Santiago Hubbell
and William Mortimore. Captain P.W.L. Plymptom, a regular
army officer, sent in a report to explain that his battalion
had failed to save the guns from the Confederate charge
because . . . a body of Volunteers (Mexican) . . . broke
from their position . . . This accusation was subsequently
repeated by Col. Canby in his official report to Washington.
For many, Canby's report supplied an easy, pat explanation
. . . no one asked obvious questions such as why volunteer
troops . . . would have been placed in the front line
by Captain Plymptom, . . . [and] what sort of casualty
rate the two companies suffered during the action."5
Other resources for the
Civil War in New Mexico include:
Kerby, Robert Lee,
The Confederate Invasion of New Mexico and Arizona
1861-1862. Tucson: Westernlore Press, 1981.
Rittenhouse, Jack D., New Mexico Civil War Bibliography.
Houston: Stagecoach Press, 1961.
U.S. Government, Official Records, the War of
the Rebellion. 128 volumes. New Mexico action
is in Series I, Vols. 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 13, 15, 22, 26,
34, 41, 48 and 50.
Howard W. Henry,6
in reading Albuquerque newspapers of 1893, found a letter
from a Confederate veteran, followed by one from a Union
veteran. Each stated his own perception of the Battle
at Valverde. Henry says, "This is probably the first
time this material has been presented to historians of
the Civil War, as I am sure not much research has been
done in these old newspapers." It is obvious that
differing views (and facts) are offered by the two veterans,
and historians will certainly refute some of the facts
stated by each man. Dates and locations were stated from
memory and are occasionally inaccurate. Nevertheless,
the letters give a view of the war not previously reported.
Albuquerque Evening (Daily)
Citizen, June 14, 1893
"In the States
[a New Orleans newspaper] of Thursday appeared an inquiry
from a reader asking for information regarding the battles
of Valverde and Glorietta, N.M. The information given
was very meagre [sic], as the official records do not
give the Confederate participants, nor the result of
the battles. Mr. L. H. Kaufman, of No. 13 Chartres street,
was a member of the second Texas cavalry and was in
the battles mentioned, and gives the following account
of the engagements:"
"In February,
1861, Col. John R. Baylor organized the Fourth regiment
of Texas cavalry and with a battalion of six companies
marched from San Antonio to El Paso, Texas, capturing
the forts on the line of march which had been vacated
by the Union troops. The forts taken were: Fort Clark,
Fort Stockton, Fort Davis, Fort Bliss and Camp Hutchinson.
From there the battalion proceeded to New Mexico and
captured Fort Fillmore."
"At Fort Fillmore Col. Baylor
halted and waited for Sibley's brigade, which had been
organized and was on the way to join his battalion.
The brigade consisted of the First regiment commanded
by Col. Scurry, the Second brigade commanded by Col.
Green, and the Third brigade commanded by Col. Bugsby.
The command was also strengthened at this point by the
addition of a company of Texans organized by and under
the leadership of Captain Capewood."
"The Federal troops
in this section of the country at this time were those
who had been stationed at Albuquerque, Santa Fe, Fort
Union and Fort Craig, or Valverde, and they were all
concentrated at the latter place, having evacuated the
above forts when the hostilities were opened. The troops
of Fort Craig were under the command of Col. E. R. S.
Canby. In addition to the regular United States troops
was a company of mountaineers, under the command of
THE DAUNTLESS KIT CARSON
After resting for a
time at Fort Fillmore, the Confederate cavalry moved
upon Fort Craig. Upon the arrival of the troops at the
Rio Grande river, the officers found that it would be
impossible to cross the river in the vicinity of the
fort, as the soldiers stationed there would have an
opportunity of offering resistance without placing themselves
in any danger."
"The troops then
skirmished around the vicinity of the fort and endeavored
to draw the soldiers out, but they refused to fight
and a flank movement was executed by the Confederates
at night by which they crossed the river below the fort
and marched upon one of the hills, where they encamped.
In the morning the federal sentries in the fort discovered
the camping place of the enemy, but on account of the
secure position occupied could not attack or dislodge
them. The Confederates marched all day over the stony
hills and endeavored to get to the river, but could
not succeed on account of the opposition offered by
the Union troops."
"That night Col.
Sibley camped his men a little back from the reach of
the federal batteries and the next morning again marched
his men towards the river. This time he found the enemy
ready to receive them, as they had constructed entrenchments
and thrown up earthworks during the night. The river
was the objective point for the Confederates, as the
troops had to reach the water. Col. Sibley saw that
it would be impossible to accomplish his purpose without
fighting, and he ordered his men to
CHARGE ON THE ENTRENCHED FEDERALS
Under the hot fire
of the attacking party the Unionists had to retreat,
and they crossed the river on pontoon bridges. As it
was impossible for Col. Sibley to pursue them he took
his men back and made camp for the night. During the
night the Federals returned to the same side of the
river as the fort and their presence was discovered
the next morning by Col. Green, who charged upon them
with his regiment and captured their batteries, completely
routing them. At this point the entire column moved
forward, and the Federals were literally slaughtered.
Some of them endeavored to recross the river, and were
shot in the water by the Confederate sharp shooters
on the shore. The loss sustained by the Confederates
during the engagement was 150 wounded, none killed;
Unionists, 82 killed, 140 wounded. This battle was fought
on the afternoon of February 21st and the morning of
the 22d, 1861 [1862]. The battle of Glorietta, or Apache
Cañon, as it is more generally called, took place
on the 24th of March of the same year."
"The Confederates,
under the command of Col. Green, marched to Fort Union,
and on the line of march captured the forts at Santa
Fe and Albuquerque. Just before reaching Fort Union,
in what is known as Apache Cañon, they were attacked
by the troops from Fort Union, reinforced with several
companies of Colorado volunteers. The noise of the battle
was heard by Col. Scurry at Santa (sic), and he immediately
issued marching orders for his regiment and went to
the assistance of Col. Green. When Green's men heard
of the approach of soldiers from Santa Fe they made
one grand charge, dislodged the Union troops and put
them to flight. Casualties in this battle were: Union,
40 killed, 120 wounded; Confederates, 36 killed, 60
wounded, 93 missing."
"The Confederates,
after their victories, remained in the vicinity for
about six weeks, and failing to find means for subsistance
(sic) they retreated to Fort Bliss. The Federals were
watching them and when they began to fall back they
communicated with the troops stationed at Fort Craig,
and they confidently expected to be able to get them
between the Fort Craig batteries in the rear and the
Fort Union troops in the front, where escape would be
impossible. Col. Sibley became aware of this plan of
action, and on the second night of the retreat the Confederates
camped near Fort Craig, with the troops stationed there
on one side of them and the troops from Fort Union on
the other. It was impossible to pass Fort Craig without
being detected, and to remain in the position meant
a slaughter of his troops when the Federals attacked
so Col. Sibley obtained a guide and abandoned all of
his wagons and traveled through the mountains all night,
when the guide brought them out several miles below
Fort Craig, and by ten o'clock in the morning they had
reached the Rio Grande without being molested. From
there they proceeded to San Antonio . . . [then] assigned
to duty in different parts of the South."
A few days later, on
Saturday, June 17th, 1893, another unsigned letter to
the editor appeared under the headlines of "Battles
in New Mexico", "Reply to Confederate Version
of Sibley Raid", "Sketch of the Valverde Fight
by One of the Participants", and "Interesting
war reminiscences". It is datelined from Los Lunas,
the home ground of several prominent Spanish gentlemen
who were in the Union service.
Los Lunas, N.M., June
16, '93
Editor Daily Citizen.
I read an article in your valued paper headed "Battles
in New Mexico," which I very much doubt whether
any of the surviving participants would recognize, or
in fact whether they would not be themselves convinced
that during those troublous times they were in a state
of somnolency or in the spirit world.
Having had the honor
of being a soldier in the Union army of the volunteer
force, I will attempt from memory to give you an account
of the battle of Valverde, which I venture will be pronounced
correct, strictly so, except probably as to the exact
date of occurrence.
[The soldier then describes
how the Confederate troops moved north after capturing
Fort Fillmore, and engaged the Union forces in several
skirmishes near Fort Craig. The main battle developed
when the Confederates on the east side of the Rio Grande
attempted to cross at Valverde.]
. . . The bulk of the
Confederate troops as soon as it became dark [marched]
north in order to make the river at the place known
as Valverde, leaving a command of about 500 men under
the command, as we were informed, of Major Lock-ridge,
to watch our movements. On the next morning, which I
believe was the 22d of February, three companies of
the Third United States Cavalry, and about as many more
of Col. Valdez's regiment under the immediate command
of Major Luis M. Baca, now a resident of Socorro, the
whole command of Col. Benjamin S. Roberts, were ordered
to proceed north on the west side of the river, and
prevent the Confederate troops from getting down to
water at the river at the place known as Valverde, opposite
the present site of San Marcial. The moment that our
troops reached the place, they were greeted with cannonading
from the Confederate troops which were already at the
river on the Valverde side, and our troops unlimbered
their guns at once and both sides cannonaded each other
until it was evident to Col. Roberts that the Confederate
troops had been driven toward the bluffs away from the
river. He then crossed his command to the east side
of the river, and sent for reinforcements to the fort,
and at 8 a.m. Carson's regiment was ordered to recross
the river from the eastern bluffs where they had passed
the night, and proceed after fully supplying themselves
with ammunition to the battle field and to report to
Col. Roberts for orders; which was done, the regiment
arriving at the scene of battle about ten o'clock a.m.
Col. Roberts ordered that the regiment be held in readiness
for orders, and it was kept in line of battle parallel
to the river on its west bank. Soon thereafter a battery
of twenty-four pounder howitzers under the command of
Lieut. R. M. Hall arrived from the fort, and reported
for duty to Col. Roberts, and an order was given to
Carson's regiment to furnish 100 volunteers to help
cross the battery over the river, and they were furnished,
and the battery was duly and safely crossed. Some desultory
fighting was going on all that day on the east side
of the river, and the Confederate troops were driven
up against the bluffs, and kept from reaching the water,
and it was the opinion of everybody that it was only
a question of a short time when the Confederates would
be compelled to sur-render, or that they would be vanquished.
During this time the casualties upon the Union side
were not to exceed fifteen in all. [Then] about 3 p.m.,
Col. Canby reached the field of battle and assumed chief
command, and the First regiment of New Mexico Volunteers,
Col. Carson's, was ordered to cross the river, and take
position as the right wing of the line of battle. An
advance movement was ordered to be made against the
Confederate troops, and they in turn charged the regiment
which was supporting Hall's twenty- four pounder battery
of howitzers; the charge was successfully repulsed by
the First Regiment of New Mexico Volunteers. It was
repeated twice, thereafter in succession by the Confederate
cavalry, and as many times gallantly and successfully
repulsed by the regiment, and the Confederates drive
(sic) in confusion to the foot of the sand hills.
About five p.m. the
Confederate troops under the cover of trees charged
Captain McRae's battery on the left, and captured it,
killing the gallant McRae and Lieut. Michler, who gallantly
stood by their battery to the last; there-upon a panic
appeared to have seized the troops both regular and
volunteer who were supporting that battery, and they
fled indiscriminately into the river, the Confederates
firing into their backs, many of the Union soldiers
doubtless but slightly wounded were drowned to the waters
of the Rio Grande. Twice upon that same fateful afternoon
for the Union troops, orders from the commanding officer
were then to the commander of the First New Mexico volunteers
on the right to retire across the river, because of
the capture of McRae's battery, and the order was disobeyed,
because neither the officers nor the soldiers of that
regiment believed that they were defeated, and because
as against the force that the Confederates had to bring
against them, they were confident that they could remain
upon that battlefield until dooms-day. But another,
and preemptory order was brought by one of the aides
de camp, and the regiment was ordered to march off the
field left on front to the river, where many of the
soldiers of the regiment failed to go into the river
in their clothes, and divested themselves of them before
taking to the water, and when they had crossed to the
east side they formed in column, and marched up the
river towards the fort, and were not aware that the
union cause had suffered defeat, until fired at by the
Confederates with the selfsame guns which they had captured
from us [McRae's battery]. The marching of our regiment
in retreat from the field of batle in such order drew
expressions of encomium from the Confederates in their
description of the battle, and of the retreat of the
Union troops, by the statement that the federal troops
had marched off the field as if upon dress parade, mistakenly
believing that our regiment must have been necessarily
a regiment of regular troops to have preserved such
order under such trying circumstances. It was nevertheless
the fact, for the first regiment of New Mexico volunters
(sic) was assigned to the support of Hall's battery
at the extreme right of the battle field, and they marched
off as as (sic) stated and brought over Hall's battery
safely, and sunk a small mounted howitzer captured on
the field in the river before crossing. I cannot account
for the many inaccuracies of M. L. Kauffmann. He speakes
of Carson, the 'dauntless,' commanding a company of
mountaineers, when he was in command of a full regiment
of infantry, being the First New Mexico Cavalry Volunteers
and four additional companies attached thereto . . .
We lost the battle,
but it is a mooted question, who was responsible party
for its loss; the regular officers, who disliked Col.
Roberts very much, always stated that he had committed
a very grave military mistake in having crossed the
river, thereby having a river at his back; but they
fail to remember that the Confiderates (sic) had been
whipped all the livelong day with less troops than when
Col. Canby unfortunately came into the field and took
supreme command with the additional re-enforcement of
Col. Miguel Pino's Second Regt. of N. M. Vols. Our regiment,
Kit Carson's, never believed that they were whipped
except because of, and on account of the orders
to abandon the field at once, and proceed to the fort
given by the commanding officer of the department of
New Mexico through his aide de camps, thrice repeated.
The volunteers
are firmly of the belief that if Col. Canby had never
come on the field, that the Confederate troops would
have been defeated, and that at his arrival on the battlefield
they were in fact and in truth defeated; and in proof
of that they point towards their conduct as described
by the Confederates believing them to have been regular
troops on account of their orderly and brave conduct
in leaving the field. [Italics added.]
Another thing, the
Confederates never crossed at night; for while they
were actually crossing the river in the vicinity of
Paraje, nearly the whole of the regular troops were
on top of the houses of the buildings of Fort Craig
seeing them cross without molestation, and wondering
the reason that the commanding officer did not order
troops to annoy them while crossing the river . . .
Our loss in the battle as it turned out was very great,
and I presume the writer of the article mentioned may
be correct in the number; but our loss up to the time
that Col. Canby assumed command, and just previous to
the capture of Captain McRae's battery was not as great
as that of the Confederates, and then the loss was of
men retreating under a panic, and crossing a river,
and most of them were regular soldiers, who with two
companies of New Mexico Volunteers, Captains Mortimer
and Hubbell [had been] left of the line and ordered
to support McRae's battery.
Mr. Kauffmann's account
of the Confederate retreat 'after their victories' is
no doubt very entertaining reading for people in New
Orleans, who never saw New Mexico, and know nothing
of the circumstances of the disastrous retreat of the
Confederate troops out of the territory, which, but
that they were made of such brave stuff as they were,
would have been worse and more calamitous than any retreat
recorded in military histories. The fact is that the
battle of Glorieta was a victory of the Federals, but
they did not know it; the Confederates knew it, and
they succeeded after the bluff made to Col. Slough to
surrender, which he refused; they then became very humane,
and obtained a cessation of hostilities for twenty four
hours to bury the dead, and immediately asked for medicines
and blankets for their wounded, which were granted.
But neither party kept faith of their plighted word,
for the Confederates retreated during the night to Santa
Fe, and the Federals made a forced march without a halt
as far as Bernal. In their own estimation both sides
were very badly whipped, but the Confederates were certain
of it, for as soon as they got to Santa Fe, they began
without loss of time to get ready to evacuate the territory,
and their many and glorious victories were to be forgotten,
and not to be accounted for thereafter.
About the 28th of March
the Federal troops appeared before Albuquerque, where
the Confederates were already in full retreat, and after
firing a few shots into the town marched under the cover
of night to Tijeras Cañon with the intention
of joining Col. G. R. Paul's forces, who were then in
pursuit of the Confederates retreating from Santa Fe
by the much shorter route from Apache Cañon via
Galisteo, San Pedro, San Antonito and Tijeras . . .
The Confederates left
Albuquerque on the morning of the 31st of March, and
the Federal troops left the mouth of Tijeras Cañon
on the road to Peralta at 2 p.m. of the same day, and
the result was that while the Confederates were dancing
at the house of the late Governor Connelly at Los Pinos,
the Federal troops arrived within 1,000 yards of that
house the same night, and could have taken the Confederates
entirely by surprise if so desired, but Col. Canby was
not so disposed. On the 1st day of April we had a little
desultory fighting at the ranch of Los Pinos, [but]
. . . left the road clear for the Confederates to cross
the river opposite Los Lentes during the night, of which
they readily availed themselves, and from thence the
Confederates marched on the west of the river southward,
and the Federals marched in the same direction on the
east side of the river. Col. Canby explained that he
did not want to take them prisoners because he could
not feed them. It was on this trip, on the east side
of the Magdalena mountains, that the Confederates buried
quite a large amount of their artillery and caissons,
and they are there to this day, and there is a gentleman
in El Paso, Texas, who knows where they are buried,
but will not divulge the hiding place unless he can
make terms whereby the trophies may be given part to
the city of El Paso and part to the territory of New
Mexico.
Now, Mr. Editor, this
is written entirely from memory, but it is mainly a
correct history of the Confederate occupation of New
Mexico, their battles, their bravery, their constancy
and gallantry under the most adverse circumstances,
battling not only against armed men, as brave as themselves,
but with that fell of all diseases, the small pox, and
the deadly pneumonia, which carried off many a poor,
brave and gallant heart to an unknown, unmarked and
untimely grave.
Peace to their ashes.
Yours very truly,
Federal Volunteer.
1Stanley,
F., The Civil War in New Mexico, 1960. Denver:
World Press, Inc.
2National
Archives Microfilm Publications, "Compiled Service
Records of Volunteer Union Soldiers Who Served in Organizations
from the Territory of New Mexico," 46 microfilm rolls
and a guide, available at Zimmerman Library, University
of New Mexico. Gives name, rank, company, age and place
of enrollment.
3Meketa,
Charles, researcher in military history. Legacy
of Honor: The Life of Rafael Chacon, a Nineteenth-Century
New Mexican, ed. by Jacqueline Dorgan Meketa.
Albuquerque: UNM Press, 1986. Also, Louis Felsenthal,
Citizen-Soldier of Territorial New Mexico, Jacqueline
Dorgan Meketa. Albuquerque: UNM Press, 1982.
4Legacy
of Honor, p. 179.
5Legacy
of Honor, p. 177, 178.
6Howard
W. Henry, NMGS member, also indexes newspapers for the
Genealogy Club of Albuquerque
This is an article from
the New Mexico Genealogist 36:3, September
1997. See New
Mexico Genealogist for a list of articles in recent
issues. |

Patricia Black Esterly, Web Editor
New Mexico Genealogical
Society
PO Box 27559
Albuquerque, NM 87125-7559
USA
Copyright © 2000-2008 New Mexico Genealogical
Society and NetChannel, Inc.
|
|